Everything Must Change

Yeah, that’s the book I’m nearly done.

And that’s the same book that I don’t know what to do with.

Sigh.

Here’s a few pieces…

The first is a quote from a fellow named Duane Clinker:

“As humans, we inherit a certain history. We inherit sin caused by decisions made in previous eras. We inherit a sort of sin ‘frozen’ into the institutions and social arrangements within which we are birthed.”

A discussion of systemic evil could run for months. But I note that it’s a topic seldom addressed within circles where I’ve grown up. However, once the concept is unveiled, there is no denying the reality of such systems and powers within our world.

With that on the table, let’s add this bit from one David Lowes Watson:

“Only a fraction of our sins are personal. By far, the greater part are sins of neglect, sins of default, our social sin, our systemic sin, our economic sin. For these sins Christ died, and continues to die. For these sins Christ atoned, and continues to atone…. As long as evangelism presents a gospel centered on the need for personal salvation, individuals will acquire a faith that focuses on maximum benefits with minimal obligations, and we will change the costly work of Christ’s atonement into the pragmatic transaction of a salvific contract…. The sanctifying grace of God in Jesus Christ is meant not just for the sinner but also for a society beset by structural sin.”

Perhaps that section speaks more loudly to me (working within a church setting) than to the average citizen. It strikes a chord with me, but the tone that resonates doesn’t leave me with a sense of clarity of where to go now, as I often long for.

Let’s add the ever-solid voice of John Stott. These words were written over 25 years ago:

What will posterity see as the chief Christian blind spot of the last quarter of the twentieth century? … I suspect it will have something to do with the economic oppression of the Third World and the readiness with which western Christians tolerate it, and even acquiesce in it. Only slowly is our Christian conscience being aroused to the gross economic inequalities between the countries of the North Atlantic and the southern world of Latin America, Africa, and most parts of Asia. Total egalitarianism may not be a biblical ideal. But must we not roundly declare that luxury and extravagance are indefensible evils, while much of the world is undernourished and underprivileged.”

That’s three little bits. If you’ve read the book yourself, you may understand the “head-spinning-feeling-swamped” kind of feeling I have right now. I’m left with little else but…

What do we do with this, my friends?

I mean, where do we start at being part of the solution? And how do we use our influence (small as it may be) to multiply our efforts?

Shaq (26/30)

For all that he’s done in his career so far, some of Shaq’s interviews just might be some of his highlights.  Here’s TSN’s top 10…

Balancing Life (10/30)

This book has been a serious blessing to me over the past six months. Something from it speaks to me powerfully nearly every time I open it.

The last couple entries I read were from a chapter called “Balancing Life”.

A woman named Joan Chittister reflected…

“All we lack, now that life has become so speeded up, is the will to slow it down so that we can live a little while life goes by. We need to want to be human as well as efficient; to be loving as well as informed; to be caring as well as knowledgeable; to be happy as well as respected. It’s not easy.”

And a few thoughts on leisure from a fellow named Michael Casey. They’re specifically about monks and nuns, but anyone seeking to “live better” will find value here…

“Leisure is not idleness or the pursuit of recreational activities. It is, above all, being attentive to the present moment, open to all its implications, living it to the full. This implies a certain looseness in lifestyle that allows heart and mind to drift away from time to time. Monastic life is not a matter of shoehorning the maximum number of good works into a day. It is more important that monks and nuns do a few things well, being present to the tasks they undertake, leaving room for recuperation and reflection, and expecting the unexpected. Leisure allows openness to the present. It is the opposite of being enslaved by the past or living in some hazy anticipation of a desirable future. Leisure means being free from anything that would impede, color, or subvert the perception of reality. Far from being the headlong pursuit of escapist activities and having fun, authentic leisure is a very serious matter because it is the product of an attentive and listening attitude to life.”

A Lover (5/30)

Søren Kierkegaard tells this story…

Suppose there was a king who loved a humble maiden.

This king was like no other king. Every statesman trembled before his power. No one dared breathe a word against him, for he had the strength to crush all opponents. And yet this mighty king was melted by love for a humble maiden. How could he declare his love for her?

In an odd sort of way, his kingliness tied his hands. If he brought her to the palace and crowned her head with jewels and clothed her body in royal robes, she would surely not resist–no one dared resist him. But would she love him?

She would say she loved him, of course, but would she truly? Would she be happy at his side? How could he know? If he rode to her forest cottage in his royal carriage, with an armed escort waving bright banners, that too would overwhelm her.

He did not want a cringing subject.

He wanted a lover.

A story like that makes me wonder a couple things.

Those times when I’m pretty sure that God should do things another way… could it be that my failure to understand His ways is rooted in my failure to grasp Him as one seeking a lover. Above everything else that He is, He is a one seeking a lover. I mean, the whole story builds upon that supposition.

“Suppose there was a king who loved…”

I’d do well to sit and soak in that phrase for a while. A little self-interrogation might follow: “DO YOU suppose such a thing, Jason? Because you’ve got no shot at syncing yourself with any part of God if you’re off on that first beat.”

I also wonder what it would take to express, with my life, to the world that first and vital supposition–that there is a king who loves. Every time I am made aware of people whose experiences with churches or “religious folks” have spoken messages of judgment or exclusion most loudly, I feel that guilt by association. And to any reader with such experiences, I do offer my apologies for my entire faith family. I have such experiences too, but at least I’m being wounded by my kin.

At this moment, I just find myself wanting to live with a flavour that makes the obvious first line of my story, “Suppose there was a king who loved…”.

Because a opening line like that would HAVE to lead to a great story.

Those Good ‘Ole Church Questions (2/30)

I never said all thirty of these would be originals, so let me stitch a few pieces together that my brother-in-law has tossed out there.

Here was recent post of his…

A few months ago I cancelled my bloglines subscriptions to many emerging / postmodern / missional / do-church-different blogs.

Yes, there is a time to criticize, reflect upon and review how things are being done, but it’s just not helpful to sit deeply in that posture for long – you end up stiff, cranky and critical. Better to get up and get busy doing things the the best way that you know how. I needed to be doing.

Just like in many areas of my life, I realized I was educated way beyond my obedience. For now, I’ve read enough about new paradigms, structures and church plants. I know the arguments for mega-church, house-church, wholistic-organic-church and frankly I’m not really convinced that one is any better than another. Sticking the word missional on something doesn’t make it missional. Finding your particular church structure in history doesn’t make you right.

The groups of Followers that I want to learn from don’t write blogs or books about “how it should be done.” They are too caught up in doing it and it’s too messy to fit into a new “paradigm.” I am realizing that there comes a time when a drop of inspiration is much more valuable than a waterfall of education.

Now, I can appreciate a few of those feelings, as I’ve often wondered how anyone (specifically myself) is to make much sense (I mean, actually reach useful points of conclusion) of all the things that are bound to come up over coffee with some of my “wanting to make church better” friends.

So I particularly enjoyed this Eugene Peterson quote, though I have no idea where it’s from (Here points to here, which points back to here, where I couldn’t find it!)…

“What other church is there besides institutional? There’s nobody who doesn’t have problems with the church, because there’s sin in the church. But there’s no other place to be a Christian except the church. There’s sin in the local bank. There’s sin in the grocery stores. I really don’t understand this naïve criticism of the institution. I really don’t get it. Frederick von Hugel said the institution of the church is like the bark on the tree. There’s no life in the bark. It’s dead wood. But it protects the life of the tree within. And the tree grows and grows. If you take the bark off, it’s prone to disease, dehydration, death. So, yes, the church is dead but it protects something alive. And when you try to have a church without bark, it doesn’t last long. It disappears, gets sick, and it’s prone to all kinds of disease, heresy, and narcissism.”

So to those who spend thought on such things, there are a couple more logs to throw on your fire.