Found a blog called Grits & Grace.
Found this great bit there…
My wife and I are participating in a group study of Dr. John R.W. Stott’s “New Issues Facing Christians Today”. It’s a very challenging and, personally speaking, very convicting book. I won’t get into the meat of the study, but I wanted to share something from the book. Stott argues that many well-intentioned Christians “prattle, plan and pray” but ignore the real need. He tells of a homeless woman whom a parish priest promised to pray for as a brush-off, and who wrote the following poem:
“I was hungry and you formed a humanities group to discuss my hunger
I was imprisoned and you crept off quietly to your chapel and prayed for my release
I was naked and in your mind you debated the morality of my appearance
I was sick and you knelt and thanked God for your health
I was homeless and you preached to me of the spiritual shelter of the love of your God
I was lonely and you left me alone to pray for me
You seem so holy, so close to God – but I am still very hungry and lonely and coldouch…
I was convicted because she could have very easily been writing that poem for me.
Matthew 25:35-36 says, “I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.”
I am reminded that as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead. As the church, we are not only to hear the word, but to act on it. By “doing” we are following God’s will out of love and gratitude for our salvation.
What follows was found at a blog called My Two Cents. It’s a couple blurbs from a book I’m not familiar with, but maybe should be. The stuff below is from a chapter called “Worship through the Ages,” which aims to trace the “evolution” of corporate worship through the past centuries to our own day.
In “reviewing” the book, blogger Chris writes this…
He concludes the chapter by describing contemporary worship–and I mean “contemporary” in the sense of time, not just genre. I think he hits the nail on the head, and I think he describes a shift that many fundamentalists have made along with evangelicals. Our worship has become very “subjective.” Needham explains:
“[I]f we could pick out one theme that has been particularly insistent in the evolution of Protestant worship since the eighteenth century, it would have to be subjectivity. By this I mean the tendency to construct and evaluate worship in terms of the human subject–human experiences, feelings, and responses–rather than in terms of the divine object, God, the blessed self-revealing Trinity, and his will, word, and activity. This subjectivity takes various forms, but they all share in common the view that worship is essentially something we experience, rather than something we offer, and that the quality of that experience is the measure of effective worship.” (Give Praise to God, p. 407, emphasis mine)
After citing none other than Jonathan Edwards(!) as a contributor to this malady, Needham addresses its effect:
“Once the criterion of effect is adopted, the corporate worship life of God’s people quickly becomes a kind of laboratory. Leaders experiment endlessly with what will produce the desired effect–endlessly, because the collective mood and spirit of a people change, so that today’s successful method becomes tomorrow’s worn-out museum piece. And even the effect that is desired changes. Is it conversion? Is it the intellectual edification of believers? Is it a blissed-out state of ecstasy? A breathless fluidity has consequently been introduced into many congregations’ worship forms, so that you may be worshiping God quite differently today than when you were ten years ago. And no one can tell what the next ten years will bring. Worship, classically understood as our participation in the eternal pattern of the heavenly sanctuary, instead comes to mirror the kaleidoscopic flux of time and fashion.” (Give Praise to God, p. 408)
Worship… one of the most used words within churches that I’m familiar with… probably also one of the most misunderstood and misused words as well.
If you’ve been looking for an avenue to throw out a “worship” idea, question, or thought… hey, just head to the comments link and get us going!
What’s below is not a JBan original by any stretch. In fact, it’s taken from a blog called Becoming Missional, which I’ve just been introduced to.
Of all the popular words that grace the covers of churchy books these days, the word “missional” is my very favorite. This is no mere buzzword, here today and gone tomorrow. Now I know… words DO lose power as we kill them and overkill them, but in marketing they are powerful depending in how you use them, like with WordTree as advertising, and “missional” holds a concept that is timeless, deeply connected to God as He is revealed in Scripture, and central to everything we are supposed to be.
Below are some interesting thoughts on the struggle between being that kind of person and being consumed by the desire to consume.
Good reading below…
Do you remember that classic television show “The Jeffersons”? It was a show in the 70’s that symbolized the idea that we all need to be working to get ahead in this world.
The theme song said:
Well, we’re movin on up, To the east side.
To a deluxe apartment in the sky.
Movin on up, To the east side.
We finally got a piece of the pie.Fish don’t fry in the kitchen;
Beans don’t burn on the grill.
Took a whole lotta tryin’
Just to get up that hill.
Now we’re up in the big leagues
Gettin’ our turn at bat………..
We’re movin on up.You see the world wants you to believe it is all about getting ahead and getting all you can. There is a level of selfishness in this attitude and we have already talked about that, but we must also understand that the executives on Madison Avenue, the marketing capital of the world, know all about the tendency to have happy feet and want to “move on up.”
Recently an episode of “Frontline” on PBS was aired (titled “The Persuaders”) that discussed this in detail. It featured commentary from leading marketing experts. The following is an excerpt from the transcript of that program.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: Not so long ago, the high-concept ads of today were all but unthinkable.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: Ads laid claim to real, tangible differences between one product and another.
KEVIN ROBERTS, CEO, Saatchi & Saatchi Worldwide: What were brands? They were based on what I call “er” words: whiter, brighter, cleaner, stronger.
KEVIN ROBERTS: Watch any commercials on American TV and you’ll see these words up in the first three seconds hammered remorselessly into your brain.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: But at some point, these words ceased to have meaning. We no longer believed that one product was any brighter or cleaner than any other.
KEVIN ROBERTS: Everything works now. You know, French Fries taste crisp. Coffee’s hot. You know, beer tastes good, unless you live in America and then, you know, you’ve got to live with what you get. But all these things now are table stakes.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: By the early 1990s, a new approach to marketing came to the fore, one that leapt right over what the product did to what the product meant.
NAOMI KLEIN, Author, No Logo: These were the super-brands, like Nike, Starbucks, the Body Shop. And what they noticed these brands had in common was that they were engaging in a kind of a sort of pseudo-spiritual marketing. So Nike said that they were about the meaning of sports, but more than that, that they were about transcendence through sports. Starbucks said that they were about the idea of community, of place, that is, a third place that is not home, not work. Benetton was, of course, selling multi-culturalism, racial diversity.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: This lesson – that a brand could forge an emotional, even spiritual bond with today’s cynical consumer – wasn’t lost on corporate America.
NAOMI KLEIN: This wave of corporate epiphanies in the mid-’90s, where all these companies, you know, were told, “You know, what your problem is, is you don’t have a big idea behind your brand.” So they would hire high-priced consultants, and they would have these kind of corporate sweat lodges and gather around the campfire and sort of try to channel their inner brand meaning. And they would emerge from these processes sort of flushed and say, you know, “Polaroid isn’t a camera, it’s a social lubricant.”
DOUGLAS ATKIN, Merkley and Partners Advertising: When I was a brand manager at Proctor & Gamble, my job was basically to make sure the product was good, develop new advertising copy, design the pack. Now a brand manager has an entirely different kind of responsibility. In fact, they have more responsibility. Their job now is to create and maintain a whole meaning system for people, through which they get identity and understanding of the world. Their job now is to be a community leader.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: Ad strategist Douglas Atkin, an expert on the relationship between consumers and brands, says he had a eureka moment one night during a focus group.
DOUGLAS ATKIN: I was in a research facility watching eight people rhapsodize about a sneaker. And I thought, “Where is this coming from? This is, at the end of the day, a piece of footwear.” But the terms they were using were evangelical. So I thought, if these people are expressing cult-like devotion, then why not study cults? Why not study the original? Find out why people join cults and apply that knowledge to brands.
FALUN GONG MEMBER: I’m loyal to this practice because it’s done so much for me.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: If Atkin could find what pushed a person from mere fan to devoted disciple, perhaps he could market that knowledge.
WRESTLING FAN: Most of the people I discuss the WWF with know that it’s not a sport, you know, it’s a masculine ballet.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: So he compared dozens of groups he considered cults with so called “cult brands,” from Hare Krishna to Harley Davidson–
VW BEETLE OWNER: If you’re smart and kind of individual, that’s what you drive.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: –from Falun Gong to Mac.
MACINTOSH USER: I think there’s something about Mac users. Like, they get it.
DEADHEAD: We just had discovered something.
LINUX USER: They realized there are other people like them, and they cooperate on certain projects, and it’s part of belonging to the tribe.
DOUGLAS ATKIN: And the conclusion was this, is that people, whether they’re joining a cult or joining a brand, do so for exactly the same reasons. They need to belong, and they want to make meaning. We need to figure out what the world is all about, and we need the company of others. It’s simply that.
Saturn is a really good example. It’s a mass cult brand. For example, 45,000 people turned up to spend their holiday vacation time at the factory in Tennessee instead of going to Disney World or the Grand Canyon. Now, why would they do that? It’s because they wanted to meet other people who own Saturns. They wanted to meet the rest of the Saturn family. They wanted to meet the people who made the car. The people who made the car wanted to meet them. And the people who ran the Saturn business knew that.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: They not only knew it, they turned it into an ad, which only brought more people into the “Saturn family.”
[television commercial] We called it the Saturn homecoming. They could see where the idea for a new kind of car company had taken shape, and we could thank them for believing we could do it.
DOUGLAS ATKIN: They created a great meaning system for Saturn in those fantastic commercials. Their meaning system was based on old-time values of community. It was a kind of an icon that America yearned for but couldn’t find anymore.
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: And that’s the object of emotional branding: to fill the empty places where non-commercial institutions, like schools and churches, might once have done the job. Brands become more than just a mark of quality, they become an invitation to a longed-for lifestyle, a ready-made identity.
Did you catch that last sentence? The bold one? Go ahead and read it again. I’ll wait.
The marketing world is trying to fill our spiritual voids with…………well, stuff actually. Nikes, ipods, VW bugs, hot tubs and everything else you can imagine. Marketers understand the spiritual void that exists deep within each of us. They know if they can connect with you on a deeper level with their product, they will sell it to you and make you a part of their community.
The lure of the things of this world becomes greater all the time. Today’s advertising bombards us with things to give us “happy feet” and send us scampering up the ladder of worldly success. But we must remain focused on the fact that, all the stuff of this world can not fill the void within.
Only One does that, and he’s not for purchase. Nor does he care to share our affections with a pair of Jordans or an iMac.
A lot can happen in that time!