Everything Must Change

Yeah, that’s the book I’m nearly done.

And that’s the same book that I don’t know what to do with.

Sigh.

Here’s a few pieces…

The first is a quote from a fellow named Duane Clinker:

“As humans, we inherit a certain history. We inherit sin caused by decisions made in previous eras. We inherit a sort of sin ‘frozen’ into the institutions and social arrangements within which we are birthed.”

A discussion of systemic evil could run for months. But I note that it’s a topic seldom addressed within circles where I’ve grown up. However, once the concept is unveiled, there is no denying the reality of such systems and powers within our world.

With that on the table, let’s add this bit from one David Lowes Watson:

“Only a fraction of our sins are personal. By far, the greater part are sins of neglect, sins of default, our social sin, our systemic sin, our economic sin. For these sins Christ died, and continues to die. For these sins Christ atoned, and continues to atone…. As long as evangelism presents a gospel centered on the need for personal salvation, individuals will acquire a faith that focuses on maximum benefits with minimal obligations, and we will change the costly work of Christ’s atonement into the pragmatic transaction of a salvific contract…. The sanctifying grace of God in Jesus Christ is meant not just for the sinner but also for a society beset by structural sin.”

Perhaps that section speaks more loudly to me (working within a church setting) than to the average citizen. It strikes a chord with me, but the tone that resonates doesn’t leave me with a sense of clarity of where to go now, as I often long for.

Let’s add the ever-solid voice of John Stott. These words were written over 25 years ago:

What will posterity see as the chief Christian blind spot of the last quarter of the twentieth century? … I suspect it will have something to do with the economic oppression of the Third World and the readiness with which western Christians tolerate it, and even acquiesce in it. Only slowly is our Christian conscience being aroused to the gross economic inequalities between the countries of the North Atlantic and the southern world of Latin America, Africa, and most parts of Asia. Total egalitarianism may not be a biblical ideal. But must we not roundly declare that luxury and extravagance are indefensible evils, while much of the world is undernourished and underprivileged.”

That’s three little bits. If you’ve read the book yourself, you may understand the “head-spinning-feeling-swamped” kind of feeling I have right now. I’m left with little else but…

What do we do with this, my friends?

I mean, where do we start at being part of the solution? And how do we use our influence (small as it may be) to multiply our efforts?

Sacred Rhythms (19/30)

Here’s my latest book to pick up.  I’m only two chapters in, and I can already categorize it.

It’s one of those “the timing of my life is such that this just might be the book I needed to find” books.  In case you can’t read it on the cover, the subtitle is, “Arranging Our Lives for Spiritual Transformation”.

Beautiful words about beautiful living.

I can guarantee that a post or two to come will contain quotes and thoughts from this book.

But for now, I’m off to celebrate the coming Year of the Rat!

Balancing Life (10/30)

This book has been a serious blessing to me over the past six months. Something from it speaks to me powerfully nearly every time I open it.

The last couple entries I read were from a chapter called “Balancing Life”.

A woman named Joan Chittister reflected…

“All we lack, now that life has become so speeded up, is the will to slow it down so that we can live a little while life goes by. We need to want to be human as well as efficient; to be loving as well as informed; to be caring as well as knowledgeable; to be happy as well as respected. It’s not easy.”

And a few thoughts on leisure from a fellow named Michael Casey. They’re specifically about monks and nuns, but anyone seeking to “live better” will find value here…

“Leisure is not idleness or the pursuit of recreational activities. It is, above all, being attentive to the present moment, open to all its implications, living it to the full. This implies a certain looseness in lifestyle that allows heart and mind to drift away from time to time. Monastic life is not a matter of shoehorning the maximum number of good works into a day. It is more important that monks and nuns do a few things well, being present to the tasks they undertake, leaving room for recuperation and reflection, and expecting the unexpected. Leisure allows openness to the present. It is the opposite of being enslaved by the past or living in some hazy anticipation of a desirable future. Leisure means being free from anything that would impede, color, or subvert the perception of reality. Far from being the headlong pursuit of escapist activities and having fun, authentic leisure is a very serious matter because it is the product of an attentive and listening attitude to life.”

Wondering

No idea what to title this post, so I’m stealing from myself…

In my quiet house, I finished “Telling Secrets” by Frederick Buechner tonight. 

Towards the end, he speaks about some healing experiences he had through involvement with an AA group. 

The thoughts that followed echoed in the corridor where my mind camps out occasionally…

“I do not believe that such groups as these… or Alcoholics Anonymous… are perfect anymore than anything human is perfect, but I believe that the church has an enormous amount to learn from them. 

I also believe that what goes on in them is far closer to what Christ meant his church to be, and what it originally was, than much of what goes on in most churches I know. 

These groups have no buildings or official leadership or money. 

They have no rummage sales, no preachers, no choirs, no liturgy, no real estate. 

They have no creeds.  They have no program. 

They make you wonder if the best thing that could happen to many a church might not be to have its building burn down and to lose all its money. 

Then all that the people would have left would be God and each other.”

Words: Part IV

I love the Scriptures.

But sometimes I don’t know what to read when I open the cover.

I recently opened The Message and flipped to what Eugene Peterson wrote as an introduction to the prophets.  Here are a few bits…

Everyone more or less believes in God.  But most of us do our best to keep God on the margins of our lives or, failing that, refashion God to suit our convenience.  Prophets insist that God is the sovereign center, not off in the wings awaiting our beck and call.  And prophets insist that we deal with God as God reveals himself, not as we imagine him to be.

For a people who are accustomed to ‘fitting God’ into their lives, or, as we like to say, ‘making room for God,’ the prophets are hard to take and easy to dismiss. 

The God of whom the prophets speak is far too large to fit into our lives.  If we want anything to do with God, we have to fit into him.

One of the bad habits that we pick up early in our lives is separating things and people into secular and sacred.  We assume that the secular is what we are more or less in charge of: our jobs, our time, our entertainment, our government, our social relations.  The sacred is what God has charge of: worship and the Bible, heaven and hell, church and prayers.  We then contrive to set aside a sacred place for God, designed, we say, to honour God but really intended to keep God in his place, leaving us free to have the final say about everything else that goes on.

Prophets will have none of this. 

They contend that everything, absolutely everything, takes place on sacred ground.

And that’s why I’ve always loved the prophets.

Thanks Eugene.